Democratic Republic of Congo vs Mauritania: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
91.8%
in 2019
Mauritania
92.1%
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
134th
Mauritania rank
133rd
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 92.1% against 91.8% in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 134th and Mauritania ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 46.7% | 46.7% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 52.0% | 84.6% | 32.6% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 92.1% against 91.8% in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Mauritania?
- 0.3%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Mauritania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Mauritania rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 134th and Mauritania ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.