Equatorial Guinea vs Nicaragua: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
70.5%
in 2019
Nicaragua
67.2%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
178th
Nicaragua rank
180th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 70.5% against 67.2% in Nicaragua, a difference of 3.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 178th and Nicaragua ranks 180th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.4% | 40.2% | 10.2% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 51.9% | 59.7% | 7.8% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Nicaragua?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 70.5% against 67.2% in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
- 3.3%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 178th and Nicaragua ranks 180th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.