Estonia vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Estonia
99.5%
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
99.5%
in 2019
Estonia rank
30th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
33rd
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Estonia
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 99.5% against 99.5% in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Estonia ranks 30th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.7% | 97.2% | 0.5% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 99.3% | 98.7% | 0.6% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Estonia or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Estonia, at 99.5% against 99.5% in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Estonia and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.0%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Estonia ranks 30th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.