Finland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Finland
99.7%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
99.7%
in 2019
Finland rank
18th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
21st
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Finland
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Finland currently reports 99.7% against 99.7% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 18th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 21st of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.5% | 99.5% | 0.0% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 99.6% | 99.6% | 0.1% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Finland or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Finland, at 99.7% against 99.7% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Finland and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.0%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Finland ranks 18th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 21st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.