Guatemala vs United Arab Emirates: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Guatemala
91.3%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
91.4%
in 2019
Guatemala rank
137th
United Arab Emirates rank
136th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Guatemala
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 91.4% against 91.3% in Guatemala, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Guatemala ranks 137th and United Arab Emirates ranks 136th of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.1% | 92.7% | 20.6% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 83.5% | 93.1% | 9.6% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Guatemala or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 91.4% against 91.3% in Guatemala as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Guatemala and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.1%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and United Arab Emirates?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and United Arab Emirates rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Guatemala ranks 137th and United Arab Emirates ranks 136th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.