Italy vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Italy
93.1%
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
93.0%
in 2019
Italy rank
125th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
126th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Italy
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Italy currently reports 93.1% against 93.0% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 125th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 126th of 191 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.4% | 85.4% | 5.1% | Italy |
| 2010s | 92.3% | 91.3% | 1.0% | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Italy or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Italy, at 93.1% against 93.0% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Italy and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.1%, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Italy and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Italy ranks 125th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 126th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.