Kazakhstan vs New Zealand: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Kazakhstan
99.9%
in 2019
New Zealand
99.9%
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
8th
New Zealand rank
6th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 99.9% against 99.9% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was New Zealand ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.8% | 99.9% | 4.1% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 99.7% | 99.8% | 0.1% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Kazakhstan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 99.9% against 99.9% in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and New Zealand rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.