Liberia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Liberia
96.9%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
96.9%
in 2019
Liberia rank
86th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
84th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Liberia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 96.9% against 96.9% in Liberia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Liberia ranks 86th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 84th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.8% | 91.5% | 64.7% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 84.3% | 95.8% | 11.5% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Liberia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 96.9% against 96.9% in Liberia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Liberia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Liberia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Liberia ranks 86th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 84th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.