Luxembourg vs Chinese Taipei: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Luxembourg
99.2%
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
99.1%
in 2019
Luxembourg rank
45th
Chinese Taipei rank
47th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Luxembourg
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 99.2% against 99.1% in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 45th and Chinese Taipei ranks 47th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Chinese Taipei in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.1% | 97.9% | 1.8% | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 99.1% | 98.8% | 0.2% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Luxembourg or Chinese Taipei?
- Luxembourg, at 99.2% against 99.1% in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Luxembourg and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.1%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Chinese Taipei?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Luxembourg and Chinese Taipei rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Luxembourg ranks 45th and Chinese Taipei ranks 47th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.