Mauritius vs Russian Federation: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Mauritius
99.6%
in 2019
Russian Federation
99.5%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
25th
Russian Federation rank
26th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 99.6% against 99.5% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Mauritius ranks 25th and Russian Federation ranks 26th of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.6% | 97.3% | 0.7% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 98.9% | 99.2% | 0.3% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Mauritius or Russian Federation?
- Mauritius, at 99.6% against 99.5% in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Mauritius and Russian Federation?
- 0.1%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Russian Federation?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Russian Federation rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 25th and Russian Federation ranks 26th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.