Micronesia (country) vs Mozambique: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Micronesia (country)
29.3%
in 2019
Mozambique
46.6%
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
187th
Mozambique rank
185th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 46.6% against 29.3% in Micronesia (country), a difference of 17.3%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.6 times Micronesia (country)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 187th and Mozambique ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.4% | 59.0% | 18.6% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 29.7% | 65.2% | 35.4% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Micronesia (country) or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 46.6% against 29.3% in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Micronesia (country) and Mozambique?
- 17.3%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Mozambique?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Mozambique rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 187th and Mozambique ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.