Micronesia, Federated States of vs Somalia: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Micronesia, Federated States of
29.3%
in 2019
Somalia
0.9%
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
187th
Somalia rank
190th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Somalia
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 29.3% against 0.9% in Somalia, a difference of 28.4%.
That makes Micronesia, Federated States of's figure about 32.8 times Somalia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 187th and Somalia ranks 190th of 191 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Micronesia, Federated States of or Somalia?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 29.3% against 0.9% in Somalia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Micronesia, Federated States of and Somalia?
- 28.4%, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Somalia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Somalia rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 187th and Somalia ranks 190th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.