Micronesia (country) vs Suriname: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Micronesia (country)
29.3%
in 2019
Suriname
53.3%
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
187th
Suriname rank
184th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 53.3% against 29.3% in Micronesia (country), a difference of 24.0%.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.8 times Micronesia (country)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 187th and Suriname ranks 184th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia (country) averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.6% | 31.5% | 1.2% | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 29.7% | 49.6% | 19.8% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Micronesia (country) or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 53.3% against 29.3% in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Micronesia (country) and Suriname?
- 24.0%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Suriname?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Suriname rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 187th and Suriname ranks 184th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.