Republic of Moldova vs Spain: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Republic of Moldova
98.0%
in 2019
Spain
98.1%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
67th
Spain rank
65th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 98.1% against 98.0% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Spain ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 67th and Spain ranks 65th of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.0% | 92.0% | 0.9% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 97.2% | 97.2% | 0.0% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Republic of Moldova or Spain?
- Spain, at 98.1% against 98.0% in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Republic of Moldova and Spain?
- 0.1%, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Spain?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Spain rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 67th and Spain ranks 65th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.