New Zealand vs United Kingdom: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
New Zealand
99.9%
in 2019
United Kingdom
100.0%
in 2019
New Zealand rank
6th
United Kingdom rank
3rd
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 100.0% against 99.9% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 6th and United Kingdom ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.9% | 99.6% | 0.3% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 99.8% | 99.9% | 0.0% | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, New Zealand or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 100.0% against 99.9% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between New Zealand and United Kingdom?
- 0.1%, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and United Kingdom?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and United Kingdom rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 6th and United Kingdom ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.