Niger vs Syrian Arab Republic: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Niger
96.1%
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
95.9%
in 2019
Niger rank
97th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
100th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Niger
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Niger currently reports 96.1% against 95.9% in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Niger ranks 97th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.7% | 83.9% | 74.1% | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 68.6% | 93.1% | 24.4% | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Niger or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Niger, at 96.1% against 95.9% in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Niger and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0.2%, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Niger and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Niger ranks 97th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.