Saudi Arabia vs Viet Nam: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Saudi Arabia
97.3%
in 2019
Viet Nam
97.2%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
76th
Viet Nam rank
77th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 97.3% against 97.2% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 76th and Viet Nam ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.1% | 88.2% | 12.1% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 96.5% | 96.4% | 0.2% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Saudi Arabia or Viet Nam?
- Saudi Arabia, at 97.3% against 97.2% in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Saudi Arabia and Viet Nam?
- 0.1%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Viet Nam?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Viet Nam rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 76th and Viet Nam ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.