Sri Lanka vs Syrian Arab Republic: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Sri Lanka
95.6%
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
95.9%
in 2019
Sri Lanka rank
101st
Syrian Arab Republic rank
100th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Sri Lanka
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 95.9% against 95.6% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 101st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.5% | 83.9% | 6.3% | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 90.2% | 93.1% | 2.9% | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Sri Lanka or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 95.9% against 95.6% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Sri Lanka and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0.3%, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Sri Lanka ranks 101st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.