Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turkey: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Saint Kitts and Nevis
96.9%
in 2019
Turkey
97.0%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
84th
Turkey rank
82nd
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 97.0% against 96.9% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 84th and Turkey ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.5% | 89.1% | 1.3% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 95.8% | 91.4% | 4.4% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 97.0% against 96.9% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turkey?
- 0.1%, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turkey?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turkey rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 84th and Turkey ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.