Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uganda: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score
Tanzania, United Republic of
79.7%
in 2019
Uganda
79.7%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
167th
Uganda rank
166th
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Tanzania, United Republic of
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 79.7% against 79.7% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Uganda ahead.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 167th and Uganda ranks 166th of 191 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania, United Republic of | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.3% | 49.6% | 36.3% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 65.1% | 68.7% | 3.6% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score, Tanzania, United Republic of or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 79.7% against 79.7% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score between Tanzania, United Republic of and Uganda?
- 0.0%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Uganda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Uganda rank globally for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 167th and Uganda ranks 166th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.