Burkina Faso vs Vanuatu: Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score
Burkina Faso
78.6%
in 2019
Vanuatu
78.8%
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
170th
Vanuatu rank
169th
Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 78.8% against 78.6% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Vanuatu ranks 169th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.8% | 64.0% | 16.2% | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 77.5% | 77.4% | 0.2% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score, Burkina Faso or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 78.8% against 78.6% in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score between Burkina Faso and Vanuatu?
- 0.2%, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Vanuatu rank globally for starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Vanuatu ranks 169th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.