South Korea vs Mauritania: Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score
South Korea
92.7%
in 2019
Mauritania
92.1%
in 2019
South Korea rank
130th
Mauritania rank
133rd
Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- South Korea
- Mauritania
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 92.7% against 92.1% in Mauritania, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 130th and Mauritania ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.7% | 46.7% | 45.0% | South Korea |
| 2010s | 92.7% | 84.6% | 8.2% | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score, South Korea or Mauritania?
- South Korea, at 92.7% against 92.1% in Mauritania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score between South Korea and Mauritania?
- 0.6%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Mauritania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Mauritania rank globally for starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score?
- South Korea ranks 130th and Mauritania ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.