Nepal vs Papua New Guinea: Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score
Nepal
89.9%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
90.7%
in 2019
Nepal rank
141st
Papua New Guinea rank
140th
Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Nepal
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 90.7% against 89.9% in Nepal, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 141st and Papua New Guinea ranks 140th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.1% | 87.6% | 22.5% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 84.5% | 89.8% | 5.4% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score, Nepal or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 90.7% against 89.9% in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score between Nepal and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.8%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Nepal and Papua New Guinea rank globally for starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score?
- Nepal ranks 141st and Papua New Guinea ranks 140th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.