Nigeria vs Solomon Islands: Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score
Nigeria
86.9%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
86.3%
in 2019
Nigeria rank
151st
Solomon Islands rank
152nd
Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Nigeria
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 86.9% against 86.3% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Nigeria ranks 151st and Solomon Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.3% | 43.9% | 11.6% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 77.7% | 79.6% | 1.8% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score, Nigeria or Solomon Islands?
- Nigeria, at 86.9% against 86.3% in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score between Nigeria and Solomon Islands?
- 0.6%, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Solomon Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Nigeria and Solomon Islands rank globally for starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score?
- Nigeria ranks 151st and Solomon Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.