Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score
Norway
99.6%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
99.7%
in 2019
Norway rank
24th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
21st
Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Norway
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 99.7% against 99.6% in Norway, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Norway ranks 24th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 21st of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.8% | 99.5% | 0.7% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 99.4% | 99.6% | 0.2% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score, Norway or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 99.7% against 99.6% in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score between Norway and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.1%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Norway and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score?
- Norway ranks 24th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 21st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.