Papua New Guinea vs Tajikistan: Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score
Papua New Guinea
90.7%
in 2019
Tajikistan
91.2%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
140th
Tajikistan rank
138th
Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 91.2% against 90.7% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 140th and Tajikistan ranks 138th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.4% | 74.8% | 13.5% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 89.8% | 88.0% | 1.8% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score, Papua New Guinea or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 91.2% against 90.7% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score between Papua New Guinea and Tajikistan?
- 0.5%, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Tajikistan rank globally for starting a business: cost - women (% of income per capita) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 140th and Tajikistan ranks 138th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.