Afghanistan vs Antigua and Barbuda: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Afghanistan
100.0%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda
100.0%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
1st
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Afghanistan
- Antigua and Barbuda
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 1st and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Antigua and Barbuda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Afghanistan or Antigua and Barbuda?
- Afghanistan, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Afghanistan and Antigua and Barbuda?
- 0.0%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Antigua and Barbuda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Antigua and Barbuda rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Afghanistan ranks 1st and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.