Angola vs Republic of Moldova: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Angola
100.0%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
100.0%
in 2019
Angola rank
1st
Republic of Moldova rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Angola
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Angola currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 1st and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.0% | 95.1% | 34.1% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 96.5% | 99.0% | 2.5% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Angola or Republic of Moldova?
- Angola, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Angola and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.0%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Republic of Moldova?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Republic of Moldova rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Angola ranks 1st and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.