Antigua and Barbuda vs Puerto Rico: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Antigua and Barbuda
100.0%
in 2019
Puerto Rico
100.0%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
Puerto Rico rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Puerto Rico ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Antigua and Barbuda or Puerto Rico?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Puerto Rico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Antigua and Barbuda and Puerto Rico?
- 0.0%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Puerto Rico?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Puerto Rico rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Puerto Rico ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.