Antigua and Barbuda vs South Sudan: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Antigua and Barbuda
100.0%
in 2019
South Sudan
100.0%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
South Sudan rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- South Sudan
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Antigua and Barbuda or South Sudan?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 100.0% against 100.0% in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Antigua and Barbuda and South Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and South Sudan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and South Sudan rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.