Argentina vs Republic of Moldova: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Argentina
100.0%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
100.0%
in 2019
Argentina rank
1st
Republic of Moldova rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Argentina
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 1st and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.6% | 95.1% | 1.4% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 99.1% | 99.0% | 0.1% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Argentina or Republic of Moldova?
- Argentina, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Argentina and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.0%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Republic of Moldova?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Republic of Moldova rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Argentina ranks 1st and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.