Bahrain vs Cote d'Ivoire: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Bahrain
99.3%
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire
99.3%
in 2019
Bahrain rank
149th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
148th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Bahrain
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 99.3% against 99.3% in Bahrain, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Bahrain ranks 149th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Cote d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.6% | 45.5% | 19.8% | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 66.7% | 80.7% | 14.1% | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Bahrain or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 99.3% against 99.3% in Bahrain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Bahrain and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 0.0%, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bahrain and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Bahrain ranks 149th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 148th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.