Bhutan vs Bolivia, Plurinational State of: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Bhutan
100.0%
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
100.0%
in 2019
Bhutan rank
1st
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Bhutan
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 1st and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Bhutan or Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Bhutan, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Bhutan and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 0.0%, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Bhutan ranks 1st and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.