Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Sri Lanka: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
100.0%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
100.0%
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Sri Lanka?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Sri Lanka?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Sri Lanka rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.