Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Denmark: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
97.5%
in 2019
Denmark
97.4%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
164th
Denmark rank
165th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Denmark
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 97.5% against 97.4% in Denmark, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Denmark ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 164th and Denmark ranks 165th of 191 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.4% | 88.9% | 1.5% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 94.5% | 95.5% | 1.1% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Denmark?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 97.5% against 97.4% in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Denmark?
- 0.1%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Denmark?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Denmark rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 164th and Denmark ranks 165th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.