Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Togo: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
97.5%
in 2019
Togo
98.3%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
164th
Togo rank
161st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 98.3% against 97.5% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 164th and Togo ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.4% | 0.0% | 87.4% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 94.5% | 56.5% | 38.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Togo?
- Togo, at 98.3% against 97.5% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Togo?
- 0.8%, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Togo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Togo rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 164th and Togo ranks 161st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.