Burkina Faso vs Finland: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Burkina Faso
98.4%
in 2019
Finland
98.5%
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
160th
Finland rank
158th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 98.5% against 98.4% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 160th and Finland ranks 158th of 191 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 95.1% | 95.1% | Finland |
| 2010s | 55.1% | 98.3% | 43.2% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Burkina Faso or Finland?
- Finland, at 98.5% against 98.4% in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Burkina Faso and Finland?
- 0.1%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Finland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Finland rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Burkina Faso ranks 160th and Finland ranks 158th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.