Central African Republic vs Hungary: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Central African Republic
91.2%
in 2019
Hungary
90.9%
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
185th
Hungary rank
186th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Central African Republic
- Hungary
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 91.2% against 90.9% in Hungary, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hungary ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 185th and Hungary ranks 186th of 191 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 84.9% | 84.9% | Hungary |
| 2010s | 18.1% | 92.3% | 74.2% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Central African Republic or Hungary?
- Central African Republic, at 91.2% against 90.9% in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Central African Republic and Hungary?
- 0.3%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Hungary?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Hungary rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Central African Republic ranks 185th and Hungary ranks 186th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.