Central African Republic vs Libya: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Central African Republic
91.2%
in 2019
Libya
92.5%
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
185th
Libya rank
183rd
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Central African Republic
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 92.5% against 91.2% in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.3%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 185th and Libya ranks 183rd of 191 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 78.7% | 78.7% | Libya |
| 2010s | 18.1% | 92.0% | 73.9% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Central African Republic or Libya?
- Libya, at 92.5% against 91.2% in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Central African Republic and Libya?
- 1.3%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Libya?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Libya rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Central African Republic ranks 185th and Libya ranks 183rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.