Congo vs El Salvador: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Congo
99.4%
in 2019
El Salvador
99.3%
in 2019
Congo rank
145th
El Salvador rank
147th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Congo
- El Salvador
How they compare
Congo currently reports 99.4% against 99.3% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was El Salvador ahead.
Congo ranks 145th and El Salvador ranks 147th of 191 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.5% | 77.5% | 25.0% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 84.6% | 99.3% | 14.7% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Congo or El Salvador?
- Congo, at 99.4% against 99.3% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Congo and El Salvador?
- 0.1%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and El Salvador?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Congo and El Salvador rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Congo ranks 145th and El Salvador ranks 147th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.