Cote d'Ivoire vs El Salvador: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Cote d'Ivoire
99.3%
in 2019
El Salvador
99.3%
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
148th
El Salvador rank
147th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 99.3% against 99.3% in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was El Salvador ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 148th and El Salvador ranks 147th of 191 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.5% | 77.5% | 32.1% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 80.7% | 99.3% | 18.6% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Cote d'Ivoire or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 99.3% against 99.3% in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Cote d'Ivoire and El Salvador?
- 0.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and El Salvador?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and El Salvador rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 148th and El Salvador ranks 147th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.