Cote d'Ivoire vs Senegal: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Cote d'Ivoire
99.3%
in 2019
Senegal
99.2%
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
148th
Senegal rank
150th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Senegal
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 99.3% against 99.2% in Senegal, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Cote d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 148th and Senegal ranks 150th of 191 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.5% | 36.0% | 9.4% | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 80.7% | 79.2% | 1.6% | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Cote d'Ivoire or Senegal?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 99.3% against 99.2% in Senegal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Cote d'Ivoire and Senegal?
- 0.1%, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Senegal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Senegal rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 148th and Senegal ranks 150th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.