Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Croatia
98.6%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
98.6%
in 2019
Croatia rank
156th
Guinea-Bissau rank
157th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Croatia
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 98.6% against 98.6% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 156th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 157th of 191 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.9% | 0.0% | 94.9% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 43.2% | 53.7% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Croatia or Guinea-Bissau?
- Croatia, at 98.6% against 98.6% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Croatia ranks 156th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 157th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.