Dominican Republic vs Laos: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Dominican Republic
100.0%
in 2019
Laos
100.0%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
137th
Laos rank
135th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 137th and Laos ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Laos in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 97.0% | 3.0% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 90.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Dominican Republic or Laos?
- Laos, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Dominican Republic and Laos?
- 0.0%, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Laos?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Laos rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 137th and Laos ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.