Equatorial Guinea vs Germany: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Equatorial Guinea
94.3%
in 2019
Germany
92.5%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
179th
Germany rank
182nd
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Germany
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 94.3% against 92.5% in Germany, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Germany ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 179th and Germany ranks 182nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.9% | 88.7% | 0.8% | Germany |
| 2010s | 95.1% | 91.1% | 4.0% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Equatorial Guinea or Germany?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 94.3% against 92.5% in Germany as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Equatorial Guinea and Germany?
- 1.8%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Germany?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Germany rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 179th and Germany ranks 182nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.