Eritrea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Eritrea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 76.6% against 55.1% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 21.5%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Eritrea ranks 190th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 191st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8% | 99.9% | 96.1% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 56.5% | 36.1% | 20.4% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Eritrea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Eritrea, at 76.6% against 55.1% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Eritrea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 21.5%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Eritrea ranks 190th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 191st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.