Eritrea vs Syrian Arab Republic: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Eritrea
76.6%
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
77.9%
in 2019
Eritrea rank
190th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
189th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Eritrea
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 77.9% against 76.6% in Eritrea, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Eritrea ranks 190th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 189th of 191 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8% | 0.0% | 3.8% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 56.5% | 51.4% | 5.1% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Eritrea or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 77.9% against 76.6% in Eritrea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Eritrea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 1.3%, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Eritrea ranks 190th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 189th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.