Guinea-Bissau vs Mali: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Guinea-Bissau
98.6%
in 2019
Mali
98.7%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
157th
Mali rank
154th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 98.7% against 98.6% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 157th and Mali ranks 154th of 191 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 2.7% | 2.7% | Mali |
| 2010s | 43.2% | 53.0% | 9.8% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Guinea-Bissau or Mali?
- Mali, at 98.7% against 98.6% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Guinea-Bissau and Mali?
- 0.1%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mali?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Mali rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 157th and Mali ranks 154th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.