Jordan vs Timor-Leste: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Jordan
100.0%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
99.9%
in 2019
Jordan rank
136th
Timor-Leste rank
139th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Jordan
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 100.0% against 99.9% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Jordan ranks 136th and Timor-Leste ranks 139th of 191 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.0% | 6.6% | 20.4% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 99.5% | 61.8% | 37.7% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Jordan or Timor-Leste?
- Jordan, at 100.0% against 99.9% in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Jordan and Timor-Leste?
- 0.1%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Timor-Leste?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Timor-Leste rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Jordan ranks 136th and Timor-Leste ranks 139th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.