South Korea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
South Korea
100.0%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
100.0%
in 2019
South Korea rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- South Korea
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.8% | 100.0% | 66.2% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), South Korea or Trinidad and Tobago?
- South Korea, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.0%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- South Korea ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.